Mistborn, Era 2: Wax & Wayne
They tell a story. Hardcover files every book in this run as fiction, and their readers there call them funny, mysterious and adventurous. Facts, not factors: neither plays any part in our call.
Listen to it
Both halves point the same way: 52 readers call it fast and only 5% of the reviews we read called it demanding, and Michael Kramer’s reading is better received than the book it came from (in the top 6% of our shelf of books, on 11,589 ratings of the narration). About as clear as this gets.
Length does not decide this
57h 32m to listen, at 1×46h 02m to listen, at 1.25×38h 21m to listen, at 1.5×32h 53m to listen, at 1.75×28h 46m to listen, at 2×about 55 hours to readabout 42 hours to readabout 33 hours to readabout 26 hours to readabout 21 hours to read
The runtime is Audible’s, 4 recordings added together, shown at the speed beside it. The reading time is our estimate: 1,663 pages in total at 30 pages an hour, the pace you told us. Ours is 50, about 300 words a page, read at 250 a minute.The runtime is Audible’s, 4 recordings added together, shown at the speed beside it. The reading time is our estimate: 1,663 pages in total at 40 pages an hour, the pace you told us. Ours is 50, about 300 words a page, read at 250 a minute.The runtime is Audible’s, 4 recordings added together, shown at the speed beside it. The reading time is our estimate: 1,663 pages in total at 50 pages an hour, which is about 300 words a page, read at 250 a minute.The runtime is Audible’s, 4 recordings added together, shown at the speed beside it. The reading time is our estimate: 1,663 pages in total at 65 pages an hour, the pace you told us. Ours is 50, about 300 words a page, read at 250 a minute.The runtime is Audible’s, 4 recordings added together, shown at the speed beside it. The reading time is our estimate: 1,663 pages in total at 80 pages an hour, the pace you told us. Ours is 50, about 300 words a page, read at 250 a minute.
Slot → chore-safe
About as demanding in audio as The Little Prince.
Easier to hear than 92% of the books we hold.
Easier to hear than 90% of the fiction we hold.
Easier to hear than 96% of the doorstoppers we hold.
Reading load against listening load
Where that puts this one among the books we hold: in the bottom 16% of our shelf of books for effort on the page and in the bottom 6% of our shelf of books for effort in your ears. The middle of the scale is not the middle of the shelf (most books sit below the average on both), so a book at 0.00 is already in the top 43% for effort on the page. Each of the three is measured against the whole shelf separately, so the bottom figure is not the top two subtracted. It is this book’s own distance from the middle.
What the audio disadvantage is made of. Two things and no others: how fast readers say this one moves, and how demanding the reviews we read found it. There is no third: the structural one has no data source, so it contributes nothing rather than being guessed at. Both directions are declared priors we have never fitted against a real verdict, which is the weakest-evidenced part of the whole model.
How the call was made
Where a bar carries ticks, the grey one is the middle of our shelf and a coloured one is a line we publish, cool where we start backing the page, warm where we start backing the recording. The evidence squares at the foot are a different thing: how far each of our four sources went, hatched where there was nothing to measure at all.
- The audio case
- 2.41It sits in the top 3% of our shelf of books for how far the recording outruns the page. Past the line where we start backing the recording.
- Narration payoff
- 0.90Michael Kramer’s reading is better received than the book it came from: in the top 6% of our shelf of books, on 11,589 ratings of the narration. This is a difference, not a score: it sets the reading against its own book, so a much-loved book with a merely good reading sits low on this shelf even where nobody disliked either.
- What is at stake
- 0.56It sits in the top 32% of our shelf of books for how well the print crowds think of a book: well enough regarded that a wasted first encounter costs more, so we lean towards protecting the page. Blended across 885,680 Goodreads ratings and 6,542 on Hardcover, each scored inside its own population first, and never added together.
For the page
- The print crowds think highly of it
For the recording
- The voice beats the book
- An easy listen anyway
- 11,589 listeners behind it
So the case for the recording won it clearly.
A bigger dot counted for more: the voice and the ear are sized by their share of the sum above, the other two by how much stands behind them. A hatched square is a reason that did not apply here, which is not the same as one that counted for little.
- Evidence
- 1.00How much of the picture we actually have, out of 1.00: four questions, each answered as far as the source could answer it, less anything taken off for reading fewer reviews than we aim to.The reading11,589 people have rated this reading: as good as it getsThe second sourceHardcover knows this book, with 6,542 readers there: as good as it getsThe matchHow sure we are that the recording we scored is this book: as good as it getsThe reviewsWe read 1,200 reviews to judge how demanding it is: as good as it gets
What each crowd complains about
In the reviews we read, how often readers brought it up and how often listeners did, each against what is usual for that same crowd across our whole shelf, which is the grey tick. The track stops at 4×. Listeners are only ever compared with listeners.
Readers of this book bring up the pace about one and a half times as often as readers usually do, while listeners of it bring it up less often than listeners usually do.
The books in it
Showing the stars as each shop prints them. The two crowds are not measured from the same place: on our shelf Audible’s listeners average 0.35 of a star above Goodreads’ readers, so a recording that is ordinary for Audible can still out-star a book that is genuinely well liked for Goodreads. Switch the toggle to take that difference off.Showing each figure as its distance from its own crowd’s middle on our shelf, in standard deviations, so 0 is a typical book for that crowd. Listeners start 0.35 of a star up, partly because anyone who finishes a twenty-five-hour recording chose it deliberately, and this takes that off. It is not a claim that audio is better, the story figure is still Audible’s own (people rating a story they heard), and none of it moves the verdict above.
One row per book: who reads it, how long it runs, then Audible’s listeners on the story and Goodreads’ readers on the book.
The Alloy of Law
Michael Kramer10h 48m8h 38m7h 12m6h 10m5h 24mAudible 4.57+0.13Goodreads 4.19+0.04
overallAudible
overall, pooled by the shop, so we hold no ruler for it
5,288 ratings · performance and story, as the shop pools them
the performanceAudible
the performance, against Audible’s own crowd
How often this goes badly0.5% of the people who rated the performance gave it one or two stars. Fewer than most recordings here. The middle of our shelf is 2.0%, and half of it falls between 1.0% and 3.1%.
25 of 4,576 listeners gave the performance one or two stars
The shape of the room
- United, this one
- Warm
- Split
- Lukewarm
A united room: 83% of the listeners gave the performance five stars. A room that agrees this far leaves little to gamble on.
4,576 ratings
the story, as heardAudible
the story, as heard, against Audible’s own crowd
4,569 ratings
the book itselfGoodreads
the book itself, against Goodreads’ own crowd
313,537 ratings
Shadows of Self
Michael Kramer12h 57m10h 22m8h 38m7h 24m6h 29mAudible 4.61+0.28Goodreads 4.25+0.30
overallAudible
overall, pooled by the shop, so we hold no ruler for it
3,283 ratings · performance and story, as the shop pools them
the performanceAudible
the performance, against Audible’s own crowd
How often this goes badly0.3% of the people who rated the performance gave it one or two stars. Fewer than most recordings here. The middle of our shelf is 2.0%, and half of it falls between 1.0% and 3.1%.
9 of 2,799 listeners gave the performance one or two stars
The shape of the room
- United, this one
- Warm
- Split
- Lukewarm
A united room: 83% of the listeners gave the performance five stars. A room that agrees this far leaves little to gamble on.
2,799 ratings
the story, as heardAudible
the story, as heard, against Audible’s own crowd
2,797 ratings
the book itselfGoodreads
the book itself, against Goodreads’ own crowd
227,602 ratings
The Bands of Mourning
Michael Kramer15h 01m12h 01m10h 01m8h 35m7h 31mAudible 4.70+0.65Goodreads 4.40+0.97
overallAudible
overall, pooled by the shop, so we hold no ruler for it
3,019 ratings · performance and story, as the shop pools them
the performanceAudible
the performance, against Audible’s own crowd
How often this goes badly0.1% of the people who rated the performance gave it one or two stars. Fewer than most recordings here. The middle of our shelf is 2.0%, and half of it falls between 1.0% and 3.1%.
3 of 2,583 listeners gave the performance one or two stars
The shape of the room
- United, this one
- Warm
- Split
- Lukewarm
A united room: 88% of the listeners gave the performance five stars. A room that agrees this far leaves little to gamble on.
2,583 ratings
the story, as heardAudible
the story, as heard, against Audible’s own crowd
2,580 ratings
the book itselfGoodreads
the book itself, against Goodreads’ own crowd
208,151 ratings
The Lost Metal
Michael Kramer18h 46m15h 01m12h 31m10h 43m9h 23mAudible 4.75+0.87Goodreads 4.48+1.33
overallAudible
overall, pooled by the shop, so we hold no ruler for it
1,914 ratings · performance and story, as the shop pools them
the performanceAudible
the performance, against Audible’s own crowd
How often this goes badly0.2% of the people who rated the performance gave it one or two stars. Fewer than most recordings here. The middle of our shelf is 2.0%, and half of it falls between 1.0% and 3.1%.
4 of 1,646 listeners gave the performance one or two stars
The shape of the room
- United, this one
- Warm
- Split
- Lukewarm
A united room: 91% of the listeners gave the performance five stars. A room that agrees this far leaves little to gamble on.
1,646 ratings
the story, as heardAudible
the story, as heard, against Audible’s own crowd
1,643 ratings
the book itselfGoodreads
the book itself, against Goodreads’ own crowd
136,390 ratings
The verdict is for the series as one commitment (57h 32m46h 02m38h 21m32h 53m28h 46m of it), because that is the decision you are actually making.
The series
Mistborn, Era 2: Wax & Wayne
No more announced yet · One voice throughout
4 books numbered on Goodreads’ list, with 1 novella or companion filed between them. Everything Goodreads lists is published, the last of it in 2022, and nothing new is announced, which is not the same thing as finished. We start saying finished after five quiet years.
Michael Kramer reads all of the 4 books of this run. Audible files them inside a longer “The Mistborn Saga” listing that runs past this one.
From Goodreads’ own series index, checked on 14 September 2026.
Every reading we hold
One complete reading of The Alloy of Law, and it is the reading the call above leans on. If there is another, we have not found it. The shelf grows in reviewed batches, never because somebody searched for a book.
- Michael Kramerour pick10h 48m8h 38m7h 12m6h 10m5h 24m · One voice · Audible UK and US
- The same voice all through
Performance 4.79 · Story 4.57 · 4,569 rated the reading · 0.5% of the people who rated the performance gave it one or two stars
Hear it · Audible’s clip, its length read from them on load
The recording we mean · The Alloy of Law
- Runtime
- 10h 48m at 1×
- Read by
- Michael Kramer
- Kind
- One voice
- ASIN
- B0064EI8FU · Audible UK
- Rated in
- Audible UK and US · 3,922 + 654 ratings of the performance
- Judged on
- 11,589 ratings of the narration
- Published
- Gollancz · 2011
Audible sorts a search by newest, so ours may not be the first one you are offered. The runtime is the check: if the one in front of you says 10h 48m, that is the reading these numbers describe. “Judged on” is the crowd behind every judgement we make about this reading: the smaller of the performance and story counts, which is why it is a little under the two shop counts added. We do not link out to a shop, and we take nothing if you buy there.